<HalfNote5> We just made a tool for keeping track of a US regulation standard
[21:24] <mithril> you could just say it corresponds to MIL-STD-105
* HalfNote5 makes a note of that
[21:25] <mithril> and I don't see anywhere that you mention ANSI or ASQC
<HalfNote5> Except in the product name. Which I could change
[21:25] <mithril> ANSI is a non-profit org and ASQC is a profit org so if you use either one of those names you might have trouble.   but if you say it corresponds to MIL-STD-105 then you're safe.  It's a military standard. 
[21:26] <mithril> just spell it differently.  
[21:26] <mithril> ancey
[21:26] <mithril> chancey
[21:26] <mithril> chantsy
[21:26] <mithril> etc...
[21:26] <mithril> but....I would get the 'ch' out of it somehow. 
<HalfNote5> LOL

[21:24] <mithril> you could just say it corresponds to MIL-STD-105
* HalfNote5 makes a note of that
[21:25] <mithril> and I don't see anywhere that you mention ANSI or ASQC
<HalfNote5> Except in the product name. Which I could change
[21:25] <mithril> ANSI is a non-profit org and ASQC is a profit org so if you use either one of those names you might have trouble.   but if you say it corresponds to MIL-STD-105 then you're safe.  It's a military standard. 
[21:26] <mithril> just spell it differently.  
[21:26] <mithril> ancey
[21:26] <mithril> chancey
[21:26] <mithril> chantsy
[21:26] <mithril> etc...
[21:26] <mithril> but....I would get the 'ch' out of it somehow. 
<HalfNote5> LOL
[21:30] <mithril> excellent work, man. 
<HalfNote5> Muchas gracias = )
<HalfNote5> I'm glad you like it.
[21:31] <mithril> you could market it as ANSI MIL compatible, etc...
[21:32] <mithril> "Sampling plan compatible with ANSI/ASQC Z1.4-1993 and MIL-STD-105"   etc etc etc...
[21:32] <mithril> kewl. 
<HalfNote5> Prefect = )
[21:32] <mithril> I'm telling you, 10-15 bucks a pop and it should sell. 
<HalfNote5> That's what I was about to ask - which ANSI/ASQC standards number this was assigned
[21:35] <mithril> ok...i've got to sleep. 